alex bitterman design.intelligence

this is alex's online home for design-oriented stuff.

Archive for August, 2007

Oh My Stars!

Star Jones

Wow! Star Jones has a new daytime call-in show on CourtTV (essentially replacing Nancy Grace, who recently shifted focus from CourtTV to CNN Headline News (both TimeWarner companies). In any case, the promo shots on the website for Star’s new show are stunning. She really has come a long way in a short time, and she looks great. Personally, I’m glad to see that she’s shifted her point of View, it’s always great to see someone triumph. Check out more about the new Star Jones show here. Best of luck Star!

My New Favorite Blog

Targeting Delaware

Bruce Jackson’s recent Artvoice piece on the state of Buffalo politics is a welcome breath of fresh air. Too often, particularly when it comes to politics, people are afraid of saying the wrong thing about the wrong person. Bruce, on the other hand, sticks to the facts and calls it all out. It’s a refreshing change when someone can write such a well informed and educational piece. Full disclosure: Bruce is a good friend of mine, so naturally, I’m biased. However, I must say, it’s pieces like this that remind me why I admire and respect Bruce so much.

Read the entire article here.

Reverse Phone Number Listing

Wow. When I was a kid, there was a BIG book that was kept behind the desk of the local public library, that had ‘reverse’ listings for all the phone numbers in the area.

Now, according to FG, you can do it online:

Sullr is a free online tool to obtain information from telephone lines in
reverse mode. Enter a phone number on the site then the name and address of
that person will appear. 5 countries available on the site: Argentina,
Belgium, France, Italy and the USA. Results for mobile numbers not yet
available.

Check out Sullr here.

Richardson site up for historic study

From

bf logo

Business First of Buffalo – 12:34 PM EDT Wednesday, August 22, 2007
by James Fink

Calling it a major step in the redevelopment of the historic H.H. Richardson Towers complex, the Richardson Center Corp. has retained a nationally recognized architecture and engineering tandem to develop a “Historic Structures Report.”

The report could serve as the blueprint for the oft-discussed plans to renovate the vacant, late 1800s Richardson towers that dominate the Delaware District skyline.

Goody Clancy, a Boston-based firm that has overseen the restoration of several other Richardson-designed buildings including Boston’s fabled Trinity Church, and New York’s Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, the same firm that oversaw renovations of another Richardson project — the New York State Capitol Building in Albany, will jointly work on the report. The firms were selected from a competitive process run by the Richardson Center Corp. Financial terms of the contracts were not disclosed.

“We have a project of national significance and consequently we attracted firms from throughout the country,” said local architect Clinton Brown, head of the Richardson Center Corp. selection committee. “Buffalo’s historic architecture is well known and highly regarded throughout the preservation community. The opportunity to work on a H.H. Richardson-designed national historic landmark is a major draw, clearly.”

The Richardson Center Corp. was created last year by then-Gov. George Pataki to oversee and chart the future of the acclaimed, but long-vacant twin towers. Henry Hobson Richardson designed the towers in 1870 for the former Buffalo State Hospital.

Goody Clancy and Simpson Gumpertz & Heger will conduct a series of interviews and public sessions that will provide input for the report. The complex has the potential to serve as a major economic engine for the Delaware District and Elmwood District, once fully restored. The report is due back by late this year or early winter.

“The ‘Historic Structures Report’ is the foundation for all future work in the redevelopment of a historic building,” said Jean Carroon, Goody Clancy principal preservation architect.

Rollerblades are so 2000…

Kangoo Jumps

These were all over Chicago when I was there last week. Very cool, easy to use, and seem like a lot of fun.

Judy Blume!

From CBC.ca:

Blume’s day
Essays reflect on teen author Judy Blume
By Katrina Onstad, CBC News
August 10, 2007

judy blume

If you were a bookish girl who came of age in the ’70s and ’80s, the novels of Judy Blume were probably a kind of psychic balm for your youthful trauma (breasts, boys, bullies). From the more skeptical regions of adulthood, it’s possible now to dismiss her hugely popular novels about white suburban girls bemoaning their bra size (Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret) and their tumultuous friendships (Just as Long as We’re Together) as whiny indulgence, and Blume herself — raised in suburban New Jersey — as a slave to the trivial concerns of the middle class.

But that would be soulless and just plain wrong, you old cynic. Her first book, The One in the Middle is the Green Kangaroo (a typically silly Blume-ian title), was published in 1969. Since then, her books have sold 75 million copies and been translated into more than 20 languages, according to Blume’s website. Her writings work the gut first, which is how she makes her young audiences into voracious readers. Through direct, emotional stories, she brings them over to the word.

A new anthology entitled Everything I Needed to Know About Being a Girl I Learned from Judy Blume, edited by Jennifer O’Connell, consists of 24 personal essays about Blume’s significance, penned by a range of mostly commercial women authors, many of whom now write for young adults themselves. Meg Cabot tells the story of a bully who wreaked havoc in her fifth grade classroom in Bloomington, Ind. (the exotic mean girl came “all the way from Canada”), drawing parallels with Blubber, Blume’s book on adolescent emotional terrorism — a.k.a. teasing.

For Melissa Senate, treating Then Again, Maybe I Won’t (in which a teenage boy’s family suddenly gets rich) as scripture provided solace after her own welfare family suddenly rose to prosperity. And writer after writer mediates on Blume’s seminal romance, Forever, the story of a pair of high-school seniors who are both loving and sexually active, two concepts generally at odds in the often punitive, moralistic world of juvenile fiction. Since its publication in 1975, Forever has sold over 3.5 million copies worldwide. For many pre-internet girls, the novel was a first encounter with graphic representations of sex and the male body, and also, the mortifying prospect that boys give names to certain of their body parts.

But for all the giggles and sighs around her writing, Blume is one of the most banned authors in the United States. Several of her books, including Deenie and Tiger Eyes, consistently appear on the American Library Association’s list of most challenged books (usually teachers and parents file challenges with libraries, asking for a ban, and the ALA fights it). At the same time, Blume was the winner of a National Book Foundation 2004 Medal for Distinguished Contribution to American Letters. Still writing at 69, she has called women in their thirties her “first readers,” telling Bust magazine: “I love your generation… You’re my most loyal readers… These young women come up to me and they look at me and I look at them and then we start to cry.”

Recently, this almost happened to O’Connell, author of Insider Dating and Bachelorette #1, as well as several non-fiction books and a series of upcoming teen novels. The over-achiever still works full-time in advertising in Boston and is the mother of two children. Via phone, I reached O’Connell at her vacation home on Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts where, in a high-pitched, and appropriately teen-ish voice, the 39-year-old talked about Judy Blume moments, what’s not necessarily wrong with today’s books for girls, and — she’s still hyperventilating — finally meeting her hero.

Author and editor Jennifer O’Connell. (Simon & Schuster)
Q: In the book, you identify something called a “Judy Blume moment.” What is that exactly?

A: The ordinary moments that become the extraordinary moments. When I graduated from high school, I sort of remember the cap and gown, and being at the podium and doing my speech, but what I really remember was that night when my best friend and I went to a graduation party and I was saying goodbye to her in the driveway. That was sort of like the moment where we said: It’s ending. We’re going our separate ways and everything is going to be new and different. That’s a Judy Blume moment, versus the idea of the pomp and circumstance. It’s the little things we remember.

Q: That kind of emotional marginalia feels so monumental when you’re young.

A: Yeah, it’s the way we remember feeling versus the things we remember happening to us.

Q: What was the spark for the collection?

A: As I was going from adult writing to teen writing, I realized that all my adult characters were like grown-up characters from Judy Blume novels — how I imagined these girls would have been when they grew up. I was sitting in my office and this line just popped into my head: ‘Everything I needed to know about being a girl I learned from Judy Blume.’ I stopped writing, and I e-mailed my agent. She said: ‘I love the line but what does it look like?’ I decided non-fiction essays would be interesting. I e-mailed a lot of female writers, and all of them were like: ‘Absolutely.’ They immediately rallied around the project.

Q: Was there a recurring theme that united the pieces?

A: Well, in Stephanie Lessing’s essay, she summarizes at the end that Judy Blume took a girl who didn’t feel normal, and made her feel normal. Judy Blume was writing about girls who were concerned about their bodies, concerned about their relationships, concerned about parents and siblings. If these girls were going through it, then she couldn’t be the only person in the world who felt the way she did.

Q: Laura M. Zeises writes that she learned about masturbation by reading Deenie, and several authors talk about how obsessed they were with the sex scenes in Forever. It seems like these books functioned as a kind of female erotica for girls, who are maybe less inclined to look at pornography, or less able to admit they want to.

A: I didn’t read Forever growing up because I was a good girl. If someone saw me reading it, I’d be a dirty girl. I went back and read all [Blume’s] books, and what’s funny is that Forever is actually so tame. But so many of the writers talked about how it would pass between them and their friends — the dog-eared pages, the ‘good parts’ all underlined. It was the ultimate coming of age story for girls, a little bible. You wondered: What’s the next stage in life? Well, that is.

Q: Even though Blume is still writing, for most of the women in this book, her oeuvre stops in the mid-1980s. How do the books translate in contemporary terms?

A: In some of her books, details have been updated for reissues, like a record player became a CD player. But the way the characters spoke, the situations they were in, stayed the same. The things she talks about are sort of timeless. In order to write for teenagers or children, it’s not about being trendy and writing about instant messaging, or cellphones, it’s about writing about the same things that kids were going through years ago. Parents still get divorced, girls hate their bodies. She wrote about real things and feelings that to this day still exist.

Q: A couple of years ago, Naomi Wolf wrote an essay condemning much of contemporary young adult literature aimed at girls, like the Gossip Girl series. Whether that’s fair or not, she seemed to be getting at something when she talked about the rampant materialism in these books, which appear like miniature Sex in the Citys — kids pretending to be adults, whereas Blume was all about taking real kids seriously. What’s going on?

A: I read Gossip Girl, all of them, and I was expecting something a lot different than what I got. I thought they would be more advanced, but I didn’t feel that the characters were all that mature, except that they were in a mature setting, the Upper East Side of New York City. Judy Blume books can be set anywhere, whereas a lot of books today are so scene-specific and kind of piggyback off whether a kid’s placed in Hollywood, Manhattan, South Beach. You need to have that glitz factor to attract readers, but I don’t think that’s enough to sustain a book. Judy can sustain a book based on characterization alone, on human emotion alone. In her books, there’s human drama but no real external drama. Maybe today with the internet and television kids need that constant stimulation.

Q: Do you think that’s true?

A: I really hope not.

Author Judy Blume. (Simon & Schuster)
Q: Have you had any response from Judy Blume about the book?

A: I actually met her for the first time on Sunday. I was up here at the Martha’s Vineyard Book Festival on the podium. I spoke for about 45 minutes, talking about the essays: Blah blah blah. There was this woman in the back row with a gentleman, and she was wearing sunglasses and a baseball cap. At the end, I was like: ‘Okay, any more questions?’ A hand goes up and I’m like: ‘Yes?’ She stands up, takes off her baseball hat, takes off her glasses. She said: ‘I thought you had to be dead before they wrote a tribute like this.’ Very lighthearted, very funny, but it completely freaked me out! I knew she had a house on the Vineyard. I had asked her to go [to the reading] through her agent and she’d declined because she’s busy. She’s got four new books coming out. I was completely floored. I said: ‘Everybody, that’s Judy Blume!’ Talk about feeling like an adolescent. Thank God I had my camera. I had to get a picture to prove this happened. But we talked for a few minutes, she was really lovely and she just e-mailed me to ask if we wanted to go to her house for dinner this week.

Q: Are you going?

A: Oh, yeah. Me and my new best friend, Judy Blume. I e-mailed my agent: ‘My BFF Judy.’ I’m taking my kids. They’re excited to meet her.

Everything I Needed to Know About Being a Girl I Learned from Judy Blume is published by Simon and Schuster and is available in stores.

Katrina Onstad writes for CBCNews.ca Arts.

Clearview

A few of you (MP and FG) sent this to me, and I think it’s a splendid article (brava, Joshua). A great read… I read a very similar article in the SEGD journal about 3 years ago, and curiously it featured exactly the same image. I thought then, as I do now, I wonder if the choice of Hellerville is a nod to the godfather of Graphic Design writing, Steven Heller? Apropos, if so.

From The New York Times Magazine

from NYT

“So, what do you see?” Martin Pietrucha I asked, turning around in the driver’s seat of his mint green Ford Taurus. It was a cold day in January, and we were parked in the middle of a mock highway set on the campus of Pennsylvania State University in State College. Pietrucha is a jovial, 51-year-old professor of highway engineering. His tone was buoyant as he nodded toward the edge of the oval stretch of road where two green-and-white signs leaned against a concrete barrier.

What I saw, Pietrucha knew, was what we all may see soon enough as we rush along America’s 46,871 miles of Interstate highways. What I saw was Clearview, the typeface that is poised to replace Highway Gothic, the standard that has been used on signs across the country for more than a half-century. Looking at a sign in Clearview after reading one in Highway Gothic is like putting on a new pair of reading glasses: there’s a sudden lightness, a noticeable crispness to the letters.

The Federal Highway Administration granted Clearview interim approval in 2004, meaning that individual states are free to begin using it in all their road signs. More than 20 states have already adopted the typeface, replacing existing signs one by one as old ones wear out. Some places have been quicker to make the switch — much of Route I-80 in western Pennsylvania is marked by signs in Clearview, as are the roads around Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport — but it will very likely take decades for the rest of the country to finish the roadside makeover. It is a slow, almost imperceptible process. But eventually the entire country could be looking at Clearview.

The typeface is the brainchild of Don Meeker, an environmental graphic designer, and James Montalbano, a type designer. They set out to fix a problem with a highway font, and their solution — more than a decade in the making — may end up changing a lot more than just the view from the dashboard. Less than a generation ago, fonts were for the specialist, an esoteric pursuit, what Stanley Morison, the English typographer who helped create Times New Roman in the 1930s, called “a minor technicality of civilized life.” Now, as the idea of branding has claimed a central role in American life, so, too, has the importance and understanding of type. Fonts are image, and image is modern America.

As a teenager in Portland, Ore., Meeker ran a small business out of his parents’ house making signs for local stores, cutting letters out of Plexiglas with a band saw. He majored in fine art at the University of Oregon and went on to get a master’s degree in graphic and industrial design at Pratt Institute in New York. In the mid-80s, Meeker created a uniform signage system for the country’s rivers and other navigable waterways for the Army Corps of Engineers. More than 200 people were drowning nationwide each year, most of them during the 30 to 40 minutes around dawn and dusk when sign visibility is especially poor. Graphic design traditionally focuses on problems of layout, but Meeker wondered if the issue wasn’t more basic — namely, the sign surface had to be brighter. He approached 3M, the Minnesota-based manufacturer whose products include Scotch tape and the Post-it note, and proposed the idea of using an unreleased line of yellow fluorescent sign material that would keep its shine during the dark morning and evening hours. “I am just like anybody else who sees a problem with a civic issue and sets out to fix it,” he told me as we sat one afternoon in the living room of his home in the Westchester County suburb of Larchmont. “I’ve always thought that design can be a form of social activism.”

In 1989, after his success with the waterways project, the State of Oregon approached Meeker with a commission to think up a roadside sign system for scenic-tour routes. The problem sounded modest enough: Add more information to the state’s road signs without adding clutter or increasing the physical size of the sign itself. But with the existing family of federally approved highway fonts — a chubby, idiosyncratic and ultimately clumsy typeface colloquially known as Highway Gothic — there was little you could add before the signs became visually bloated and even more unreadable than they already were. “I knew the highway signs were a mess, but I didn’t know exactly why,” Meeker recalled.

Around the same time Meeker and his team were thinking about how to solve the problem of information clutter in Oregon, the Federal Highway Administration was concerned with another problem. Issues of readability were becoming increasingly important, especially at night, when the shine of bright headlights on highly reflective material can turn text into a glowing, blurry mess. Highway engineers call this phenomenon halation and elderly drivers, now estimated to represent nearly a fifth of all Americans on the road, are most susceptible to the effect.

“When the white gets hit, it explodes, it blooms,” Meeker, who has the air of a scruffy academic, went on to say.

He placed two road signs side by side on his couch and shined a flashlight at each in quick succession. In the path of the moving beam, the first, a white-on-black street sign from the early 1900s, remained dark; its letters became momentarily lighter but not much brighter. As he moved the light to the second sign, a more modern white-on-blue sign taken from a nearby intersection, its whole surface brightened, sending back waves of light and giving the letters a fuzzy, white glow. Repeated at 70 miles per hour, especially for drivers with impaired vision, the effect is not only annoying but also dangerous.

The government’s highway engineers proposed increasing the size of the letters by 20 percent. But larger letters would mean even larger signs, a costly and cumbersome venture that would do little but increase visual clutter on the roadway. “You’re talking about billions of dollars,” Meeker said, explaining that on signs what is taller is also wider. “It wouldn’t just be a question of replacing the signs and all their support structures, but you would have to widen lanes and redo overpasses to make room for these things.”

Meeker wasn’t working for the federal highway agency, but in his mind the problem of clutter on signs in Oregon and the federal government’s concern with halation seemed intertwined. Along with researchers from the Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, a highway-research body attached to Penn State that was also interested in questions of sign legibility, Meeker again approached 3M — the manufacturer of most of the country’s reflective sign material — with the idea of joint studies on the relationship between typeface design and halation.

What started as a project to organize information for tourist routes in Oregon would soon turn into an all-consuming quest, and one that marked the first time in the nation’s history that anyone attempted to apply systematically the principles of graphic design to the American highway.

Road signs first appeared in ancient Rome as stone markers counting the distances to various cities in the empire. In the age of the automobile, they began popping up on the side of the road a little more than a decade after the Ford Motor Company released its first Model T. Auto clubs and state highway departments placed the markings with little thought toward uniformity or consistency, and issues of typography were barely considered. The text that did appear on these early signs was largely hand-painted and all in uppercase, simply because no one could effectively draw lowercase letter forms by hand.

Explaining the task of drawing letters, Meeker said: “All capital letters are either straight lines or curved lines. The worst-case scenario is pretty much ‘B.’ ” But lowercase letters, maddening knots full of arcs and curves, present a more serious challenge to the Sunday-afternoon road-sign painter.

Hand-drawn signs were difficult to read at night, not because of the halation but because there was simply no shine to catch the driver’s attention. To try to remedy this, municipal sign makers began sprinkling handfuls of coarse sand on the freshly painted letters, followed by experiments with marbles. The first truly reflective sheeting came later, in the early 1940s, when 3M introduced sign material made with a patchwork of glass beads laminated under a plastic film.

Until the 1920s, when the development of die-cut technology allowed for the shaping and cutting of thin metal alloy, signs were often idiosyncratic, with layouts and typefaces varying by city and region. But as the popularity and accessibility of long-distance road travel increased, so, too, did the need for coherent nationwide standards. Federally approved fonts first appeared in the 1935 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the bible of federal road and highway standards that dictates the size, shape and placement of road signs.

In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower announced his goal of an expanded Interstate System, and highway engineers worked quickly to fashion a rough alphabet by rounding off the square edges of the block lettering created during die-cut sign making. Today, there are six Highway Gothic typefaces in the official Federal Highway Administration series. Most prevalent on the modern highway is the fifth typeface in the family, Series E-Modified, and it is with this that Clearview is most often directly compared.

The letter shapes of Highway Gothic weren’t ever tested, having never really been designed in the first place. “It’s very American in that way — just smash it together and get it up there,” says Tobias Frere-Jones, a typographer in New York City who came to the attention of the design world in the mid-1990s with his Interstate typeface inspired by the bemusing, awkward charm of Highway Gothic. “It’s brash and blunt, not so concerned with detail. It has a certain unvarnished honesty.”

The quirky appeal of imperfection does give Highway Gothic its fans, who share highway lore and trade vintage road signs on the Internet. To highway enthusiasts like Richard Moeur, who runs a Web site devoted to traffic signs, the existing highway typeface has become evocative of the wonder of the open road. Moeur mentioned one example of the classic highway look “in the wild,” as he calls it, on a stretch of Interstate 40 on the road into Flagstaff, Ariz.: “There it is, in big 16-inch letters and a 3-foot tall Interstate shield, on a sign 10 feet tall by 16 feet wide — ‘I-40 WEST Los Angeles.’

“That sense of possibility has always meant a lot to me,” he says. “For some, a sign is just a utilitarian object. For others, it’s a symbol of connectivity.”

Meeker initially assumed that the solution to the nation’s highway sign problem lay in the clean utilitarian typefaces of Europe. One afternoon in the late fall of 1992, Meeker was sitting in his Larchmont office with a small team of designers and engineers. He suggested that the group get away from the computer screens and out of the office to see what actually worked in the open air at long distances. They grabbed all the roadsigns Meeker had printed — nearly 40 metal panels set in a dozen different fonts of varying weights — and headed across the street to the Larchmont train station, where they rested the signs along a railing. They then hiked to the top of a nearby hill. When they stopped and turned, they were standing a couple hundred feet from the lineup below. There was the original Highway Gothic; British Transport, the road typeface used in the United Kingdom; Univers, found in the Paris Metro and on Apple computer keyboards; DIN 1451, used on road and train signage in Germany; and also Helvetica, the classic sans-serif seen in modified versions on roadways in a number of European countries. “There was something wrong with each one,” Meeker remembers. “Nothing gave us the legibility we were looking for.” The team immediately realized that it would have to draw something from scratch.

Two designers working with Meeker, Christopher O’Hara and Harriet Spear, set out to create the new typeface, initially based on hand-drawn traces of Highway Gothic. “We wanted to take out the goofiness, to restore some sort of rational relationship to type design,” O’Hara told me. “There are a lot of things about it that don’t make any sense.” O’Hara and Spear started by opening the font up, carving out the cramped interior areas of the letters that trapped light and gave Highway Gothic its notoriously fuzzy quality.

The first indication of success came a few months later, in January 1993, when Meeker took O’Hara’s early sketches to Penn State for some human testing. He showed the drawings to Pietrucha and his colleague Philip Garvey, a researcher with a background in human psychology. In Clearview’s first public test, Garvey sat in an office chair in the basement of the Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, with Clearview displayed on a computer screen at the opposite end of the long hallway. To simulate halation, they turned off all the lights and blurred the letters on the monitor. Clearview certainly looked better, but could they prove it?

Intrigued by the early positive results, the researchers took the prototype out onto the test track. Drivers recruited from the nearby town of State College drove around the mock highway. From the back seat, Pietrucha and Garvey recorded at what distance the subjects could read a pair of highway signs, one printed in Highway Gothic and the other in Clearview. Researchers from 3M came up with the text, made-up names like Dorset and Conyer — words that were easy to read. In nighttime tests, Clearview showed a 16 percent improvement in recognition over Highway Gothic, meaning drivers traveling at 60 miles per hour would have an extra one to two seconds to make a decision.

Word of the Penn State tests soon reached the Texas Transportation Institute, which conducted its own tests and then requested 25 computer disks with Clearview for further testing. “I knew we were onto something,” Meeker says. “But we were still too raw. We needed some polish.” He began asking around for recommendations in the tightly knit world of type design. A friend mentioned the name of James Montalbano, an upstart type designer who had already received some renown for drawing custom fonts for magazines like Glamour and Vanity Fair.

Montalbano, now 53 years old, works from a studio on the top floor of a brownstone near the Brooklyn waterfront. He has close-cropped hair and constant stubble, as well as the lumbering, punch-you-in-the-ribs demeanor of a high-school woodshop teacher, a job he in fact held for a year after graduating from Kean University in Union, N.J. In kindergarten in Jersey City, he was scolded for his stubborn insistence on drawing two-tiered lowercase “a” ’s. But it wasn’t until he took a continuing-education class with the type designer Ed Benguiat at the School of Visual Arts in Manhattan in the late 1970s that Montalbano discovered his talent for creating his own type.

At their first meeting, a hot, muggy day in the summer of 1995, Meeker came to Montalbano’s apartment to show the early sketches of Clearview. “It was stiff — there wasn’t any sort of grace to it,” Montalbano told me last winter of his initial impressions of the raw typeface. The stem weights were inconsistent, meaning the font looked bolder in some letters and lighter in others, and the baseline levels of the letters were uneven, giving it a wobbly, slightly boozy look. Montalbano recalls interrupting Meeker’s impassioned presentation. “I don’t know much about all this legibility theory,” he remembers saying. “But I do know about poorly drawn type.” He was hired immediately and set to work to sculpture Meeker’s initial drawings into a complete, sellable typeface.

“The fundamental flaw of Highway Gothic is that the counter shapes are too tiny,” Montalbano told me, referring to the empty interior spaces of a typeface, like the inside of an “o.” When viewed from a distance, and especially at night under the glare of high-beam headlights, the tightly wound lowercase “a” of Highway Gothic becomes a singular dense, glowing orb; the “e,” a confusing blur of shapes and curved lines. Meeker puts it more bluntly: “They look like bullets that you couldn’t put a pin through.”

Montalbano smoothed out the rough, imprecise edges of O’Hara and Meeker’s first version, widening the counter shapes even further. He understood that Clearview’s success would come not from where its shapes are on the sign but precisely in where they are not — the open spaces in Clearview’s letters are what make it so readable. It is as if, as Pietrucha put it that morning on the test track at Penn State, “we put the typeface on a diet”.

But selling the government on the idea of adopting Clearview as a road sign font was another matter. Over several years Meeker and Pietrucha went to meetings at the Federal Highway Administration; they would end each one by setting up a row of sample highway signs in the long hallways of the agency’s headquarters. The government’s own engineers were impressed with Clearview, but any immediate progress was slowed by the inevitable forces of inertia and bureaucracy in Washington. “We’d go in each time excited,” Meeker says of their presentations to federal officials. “And we’d leave each time thinking, ‘Why did we even bother?’ ”

At times, Clearview receded to the background as both Meeker and Montalbano busied themselves with other, more immediately fruitful design work. But they would keep returning to the font for minor changes: an adjustment in thickness here, a change in letter spacing there.

“Those guys are tinkerers,” Pietrucha says of Meeker and Montalbano. “They were always playing around, wondering how we could optimize it. We had something we called Clearview, but was there a Clearer-view? Or a Clear-est view?”

Type is just as much about psychology as geometry. A letter’s shape, its curves, the way it sits next to other letters — all these factors give a font its personality and in turn create an emotion and connotation for the reader.

Clearview is a sans-serif face, meaning the terminal points of its letters lack any ornamental lines, wedges and other shapes. It wasn’t until the 1920s that sans-serif came into wide use with typefaces like Futura and later, in the ’50s, Helvetica, but they are now the typeface style of choice for any design job requiring a clean, vaguely futuristic aesthetic. The clear, pristine shapes of sans-serif fonts grab the eye in an instant, lending themselves to advertising copy and large, punchy headlines as well as highway signs. But in large blocks of text, the detailed edges of the letter forms in serif fonts give the type an easy-to-follow flow reminiscent of cursive script, making them the preferred typeface for newspapers, magazines and books.

There are some typefaces that work for selling estate jewelry and others that seem to fit in best pushing high-tech toys. Volkswagen’s aggressively plain ads for the Beetle ushered in a new era of straightforward and minimalist advertising in the ’60s. “The Creative Revolution,” as it came to be known in the advertising world, was set off by a few words — “Lemon” and “Think Small” were among the most popular slogans — written in Futura, a typeface chosen for its bare style that spoke to Volkswagen’s message of simple claims and precision engineering. Decades later, in the early 2000s, a light and nimble lowercase typeface style defined the waning years of the dot-com boom. Its casual, approachable look quickly appeared in the logos of corporate behemoths like Cingular, British Petroleum and Accenture. Stodgy or irreverent, timely or timeless, typography helps establish the ethos and identity of a brand — and it can have a similar effect on the highway.

“Type on the roadway is very much like the corporate identity of a country,” says Graham Clifford, a friend of Montalbano’s who runs his own branding and design firm in New York. Clifford, who is English, mentioned the ubiquity of British Transport, which has been used in his country since the late 1950s. In the decades since its adoption, it has appeared on T-shirts and in advertisements, much as Highway Gothic has come to infuse the American consciousness. Phil Baines, a London-based typographer, once called British Transport “the house style for Britain.” Other countries have their own style, too. Clifford told of a trip he took with his wife, driving from England through Wales, then crossing by ferry to Ireland and up to Northern Ireland. Many signs in and around Dublin were written in a quirky local script; the markers in Belfast, however, were uniformly British Transport. “The change in typeface lets you know you’re in a different place,” Clifford said.

It can also let you know you’re in a different time. In 1941, Hitler abandoned the ornate blackletter typeface that had been a text standard in Germany since the Gutenberg era. Party propaganda was then printed in a roman serif typeface, giving the Nazi regime a starkly modernist identity. “Typography is all about tone of voice,” Clifford says. “Do I shout at people? Do I whisper at people? Do I scream from the rooftops? Am I talking to a woman? To a man?”

Highway Gothic conjures the awe of Interstate travel and the promise of midcentury futurism; Clearview’s aesthetic is decidedly more subdued. “It’s like being a good umpire,” Pietrucha says, suggesting that one of Clearview’s largest triumphs will be how quietly it replaces Highway Gothic sign by sign in the coming years. “It will completely change the look of the American highway, but not so much that anyone will notice.”

As Montalbano tweaked Clearview’s design, a problem continued to gnaw at him. Thicker, darker letters are more recognizable on signs, but they can also lead to dense, bloblike shapes that tend to blur, especially at night — the main downfall of Highway Gothic. How could he increase Clearview’s profile, Montalbano wondered, without repeating the same designs mistakes of its predecessor? The answer would come thanks to a branding crisis at the National Park Service.

In the summer of 1998, the park service had just received some alarming news: According to one survey, the vast majority of Americans were under the false impression that Smokey Bear worked for the National Park Service and not the Forest Service. At the time, the park service was using a mismatched collection of a half-dozen typefaces on its road signs, wayposts and other printed materials. A signature typeface, it reasoned, would help to solve its brand-recognition problem.

The park service hired Montalbano and Meeker to come up with one. After considering various existing faces, Montalbano ended up drawing a stately looking serif that he dubbed Rawlinson, his wife’s last name. “My father-in-law worked for the Forest Service,” he told me, “so I thought I’d name the park service font after him, just to keep the confusion alive.”

They sent the typeface to Penn State for testing; it came back showing only a 2 percent improvement in legibility over Clarendon, the serif font in use at the time on the park service’s road signs. Montalbano received a call from a worried Meeker. “We knew that no bureaucracy would ever change anything for a 2 percent improvement,” Montalbano says. To increase recognition at longer distances, Montalbano tried pulling up the height of the lowercase letters, bringing them almost level with the height of the capitals. In typographic jargon, this measure is known as the x-height, based on the level of the top of the lowercase x, and even more than the shapes of the letter forms themselves, it can give a typeface an individual character.

Montalbano explained this idea over lunch at a cafe across the street from his office in Brooklyn. “If a word is set in all caps, all you will see are little white rectangles,” he said, scribbling a quick “HELLO” on a napkin. The word looked heavy, almost industrial.

“But this has a definite profile,” he continued, and then he drew “Hello” again on another napkin, this time in a mix of upper- and lowercase letters, its peaks and curves and dips setting off all the necessary clues in the subconscious. He held the paper in front of me. As he slowly pulled it farther away, the individual letters became harder to read, but the shape of the word remained distinct. “Your brain,” he concluded, “knows the shape of the word.”

With an increased x-height, Rawlinson showed a significant improvement in legibility while taking up 15 percent less sign space than the heavy, powerful-looking Clarendon. “I called Don up right away and told him, ‘I want to apply this same idea to Clearview,’ ” Montalbano said.

Meeker and Montalbano staged a demonstration a few weeks later at the Penn State test track, spending a few thousand dollars of their own money to print up highway signs with the new version of Clearview. They invited representatives from the Federal Highway Administration and transportation officials from half a dozen states. The group stood on the tarmac and stared at a side-by-side comparison of Clearview and Highway Gothic. “Signs that you’d be hard pressed to read at 700 feet were legible at 900 or 1,000 feet,” Montalbano said. “People were really freaked out”.

Clearview, then, had succeeded in its mission: It made signs easier to read from a distance and reduced the distracting nighttime blur of halation. But its most visible debut came not on the highway but on the oversize billboards of Times Square. On New Year’s Day 2006, AT&T revealed its redesigned brand image. Clearview was featured in headlines, billboards and advertising copy, as well as on huge banners plastered around Midtown Manhattan.

The company wanted to project “a more welcoming and transparent image,” says Wendy Clark, a senior vice president in charge of advertising at AT&T. For more than a decade, the company had been using Gill Sans, a leaden, staid typeface from the 1920s. Market research showed that many consumers identified the old AT&T with attributes like “monolithic” and “bureaucratic” — an image problem it hoped to fix, in part, with a new typeface.

“Clearview is approachable,” says Craig Stout, a creative director at Interbrand, the agency that oversaw the AT&T campaign. “It isn’t shouting at you to get your business.” A year after AT&T began using Clearview for all its advertising and corporate communications, Interbrand conducted a follow-up survey, asking consumers, “Do you consider AT&T to be a technologically savvy brand?” Positive responses had doubled.

“The highway stuff is what got me into it, but it’s the font’s other applications that have me really excited,” Montalbano says. In addition to creating a parallel Clearview type family for standard design applications, he is also working on converting it into foreign scripts. There is already a special Latin alphabet designed for Eastern European languages. Maxim Zhukov, a Russian typographer, is adapting the type design for translation into Cyrillic. That a typeface originally inspired by a problem with tourist signage in Oregon could one day line the cavernous halls of the Moscow metro is not so much a testament to Clearview’s functional, universal appeal as it is to typography’s strange and enigmatic power of reincarnation. “The real life of a font is mysterious and unpredictable,” Zhukov says. Certainly that has been the case with Clearview. Oregon, as it happens, has yet to adopt the typeface.

A couple months ago, Meeker’s 12-year-old son, Eric, had his own unplanned encounter with the typeface. He had a homework assignment due in his seventh-grade English class, Eric told me, and in a rush, he printed a document — a fictionalized journal entry from the Civil War — from a computer in his dad’s downstairs office. Hurrying out the door, he didn’t notice it had printed in Clearview. A few days later, his teacher handed the assignments back. “Great job,” he said to Eric. He paused, then added, “There was just something about it that made it so easy to read.”

Joshua Yaffa is a recent graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. This is his first article for the magazine.

Use YOUR Nuclear Option!

Who’s yo’ daddy?

China is yo’ new daddy. Not only have Chinese companies for years been poisoning our food, selling shoddy consumer goods (that Americans gladly buy becuase they are slightly cheaper than goods produced in the US, primarily because they are produced in sweatshops by slave labor), and pirating Western software and intellectual property. Now, the Chinese government has come out with a VERY SHARP reminder that they now own the US economy. What’s a bit more scary, is that the Chinese government not only has the power to manipulate the US economy, but the newly announced plan is to hold the US consumer hostage — essentially, buy Chinese goods, and stop whining about quality, lead paint, fake glyceryn, and melamine OR we’ll bring your economy to its knees.

I honestly wonder if the US public understands the gravity of this so called economic “nuclear option”? Maybe when folks can’t afford to buy cheap shit at Wal*Mart, they’ll finally wake up, and pay attention as to why. I say, use YOUR nuclear option: make it a household rule if you can’t buy goods made in the US or EU, buy from friends in Japan, India, Laos, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, S. Korea, or even better yet, Taiwan.

So kids pick your poison:

Read about Paris Hilton and American Idol here.

OR

Read the details of the Chinese “Nuclear Option” here.

Dear Jon Klein:

I am an avid CNN viewer, in fact, CNN is pretty much the only thing ON TV in my house.

I’m disappointed to see the departure of Paula Zahn, but I am quite eager to see how CNN will fill the spot. Rumor has it that Cambell Brown will fill the spot to go head to head with Bill O’Riley on Fox and Keith Oberman on MSNBC. That is also…

::cue needle off the record sound::

WHAT?

Are you kidding?

What the hell kind of “take on” strategy is that? Sounds like: We know we can’t win any of the miserable, senior, crummegeonly, male viewers, so instead we’ll go after the leftover female demographic that’s completely unserved during that hour?

Well here’s a newsflash for you, Jon. Most women (of all ages) that I know are a.) more avid news watchers than miserable old men, b.) more likely to watch news at 8pm than most guys I know, and c.) starving for “real” news and not the ample fare of sensational Dateline/Primtime/20/20 Stories about child molesters, credit card debt, theives, and other panic-fed vulnerabilities.

Here’s a thought, why not move Jack Cafferty to 8pm for an interactive call-in show, and instead, offer Cambell an early afternoon slot, say 3, 4, or 5pm ET (that clearly fits the demographic you’re trying to reach)? Sounds like a much more viable plan to me.

I’ll be eager to see the choice you make. Hopefully it will be one that provides viewers with a substanative news choice, and not simply newsutainment.

Older entries »